Contact phone number:

Contact email:

Unlike mocks, fake implementations give us full power over our dependencies in product exams, allowing united states to truthfully and completely testing reactive moves.

November 26, 2021

Unlike mocks, fake implementations give us full power over our dependencies in product exams, allowing united states to truthfully and completely testing reactive moves.

At OkCupid, we frequently make use of the Mockito library for generating mocks of your dependencies used within our JUnit reports. This enables all of us to conveniently mock return values beyond doubt strategies, or even examine a technique was actually known as using one in our dependencies, however it provides difficulties given that integration involving the component under ensure that you their dependencies be a little more challenging.

On this page, we’re browsing walk-through a constraint receive utilizing a mocking collection, and discuss how we could get past that restriction simply by using our very own fake implementation. Let’s begin by setting the stage when it comes to issue.

Setting The Level

Before we discuss the difficulty, let’s be certain that we see the element under test. We’ll keep an eye out at a ViewModel which responsible for making a system request and showing some results.

The following could be the snippet for all the ViewModel, however if you’d want to see the associated sessions, you can find all of them contained in this gist. Observe that inside ViewModel, the moment it is developed, we request profile ideas within the init system:

Whenever all of our ViewModel is made, we’ll produce a loading state to your LiveData. Then, we’ll consult a profile, and post a fresh ProfileViewState if the name succeeds or fails.

This is exactly everything we are in need of for our element under test. Next we are able to check it out.

Testing The ViewModel

We’ll start with one good circumstances test to make sure that as soon as we eros escort Richardson TX request a person, a running condition was released accompanied by an information condition. Let’s see what that examination appears to be:

If you’d want to see the implementation of .testObserver() you’ll find it in this gist .

The Exam Fails

To your wonder, this test will give up! Our company is mocking a fruitful information request, therefore we should count on our observedStates have two records: one when it comes down to running county, plus one the successful data state. Upon working the test, the most important assertion fails. Our examination says that observedStates.size is certainly one, while the price may be the data county.

This means, the test wasn’t able to verify that a loading county took place.

How It Happened?

Let’s remember what’s various in our unit examination than actual code. Within our unit examination, we’re moving Scheduler.trampoline() from RxJava that will help to really make the community consult operate just as if they happened to be sequential. Regarding this test, it is as though the circle request succeeds instantaneously the moment the ViewModel is made.

After that, after the ViewModel is generated, we use a test observer from the ViewModel.state LiveData, and that’s currently in a loaded data condition. This implies the running condition happened too far back in committed – we can’t note a LiveData earlier’s developed, and thus we have no chance to confirm a loading state ever happened.

This complication is actually due to our very own mocking collection, which informs all of our mock repository to return suggestions at once. Alternatively, we are able to establish our personal phony implementation of a ProfileRepository that we have full control over, and can controls that emission of data assure the unit examination captures the loading condition.

Generating A Fake

To create a fake execution, we start with producing an innovative new class that implements our very own software. Remember, we don’t want our artificial to go back facts right-away, for the reason that it will only result in the exact same complications. As an alternative, since we’re using RxJava, we could carry out the fake such that uses a BehaviorSubject behind-the-scenes we can get a grip on.

The execution you use here may changes if you are using coroutines, nevertheless principle remains the exact same: we don’t wish to come back from fetchProfile() with advice immediately. We wish to ensure that all of our phony execution controls exactly whenever that information is emitted.

Managing Facts Pollutants

Since all of our artificial implementation is using a BehaviorSubject given that hidden data source, we are able to make our very own community solution to produce to it if we like:

Updating Examinations To Validate Running State

Since we’ve something in position in which we’ve got fine-grained control of whenever information is emitted from your repository, we could control this to precisely test our very own loading condition. We’ll follow this meal:

  1. Generate all of our phony repository and ViewModel part
  2. Since the fake cannot produce information quickly, I will be in a position to confirm that individuals come in a loading county.
  3. We are able to get a handle on the fake execution to produce facts.
  4. Last, we could confirm that our ViewModel has become in a loaded facts state.


Mocking libraries supply a fast answer for promoting dependencies to utilize inside our Android os device examinations, but appear at the cost of having limitations for controlling the conduct of the dependencies. By leveraging interfaces and our personal fake execution that is out there in our code base, there is full control of the dependencies and we also are able to use that to manage the emission of information for reactive passes to completely unit testing our very own components.

I’m hoping your receive this useful! When you yourself have different samples of utilizing a fake compared to a mock, let me know on Twitter.

Into doing work for OkCupid? We’re contracting!

0 Comment on this Article

Add a comment